Qamar Hussain t/a Radiant Technological Services v Financial Conduct Authority: FIN/2007/0006
Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery decision of Judge Oliver on 18 December 2007.
Read the full decision in .
SUPERVISORY NOTICE 鈥� Application for direction to suspend effect of notice until reference disposed of 鈥� Notice varied Applicant鈥檚 permission by removing all regulated activities with immediate effect 鈥� Reason for notice being breach of threshold condition 5 鈥� In application for permission to conduct regulated activities the Applicant failed to disclose relevant convictions 鈥� Applicant failed to disclose convictions taking place after his approval 鈥� Applicant refuses to cease carrying out regulated activities notwithstanding the notice 鈥� Whether Tribunal satisfied that the direction to suspend the effect of the notice would not prejudice the interests of the consumers 鈥� No 鈥� Whether necessary for notice to take effect immediately 鈥� Yes 鈥� Whether register should include no particulars about the reference 鈥� No 鈥� Applications dismissed 鈥� Financial Services and Markets Tribunal Rules 2001 SI 2001 NO2476 Rule 10(1)(e), Rule 10(6) and Rule 10(9).