Understanding the politics of Covid-19 in Kampala, Nairobi and Mogadishu: A political settlements approach

This paper analyses the politics of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic in three East African capital cities

Abstract

This paper analyses the politics of the response to the Covid-19 pandemic in three East African capital cities: Kampala, Nairobi and Mogadishu. It does so by describing measures to treat, prevent, and mitigate the impact of the pandemic, especially in low income neighbourhoods, tracing these to dynamics among policy actors in what it calls the 鈥淐ovid policy domain鈥�. It also situates the character of the response within each country鈥檚 鈥減olitical settlement鈥�, tentatively suggesting that the fingerprints of a 鈥渂road dispersed鈥� political settlement type can be observed in some of the similarities of response, even as the pandemic provided a stimulus to an increased concentration of power. Differences, meanwhile, might be explained by the differential role of the capital city in each of these political settlements: Kampala being perceived mainly as a threat to be contained, Nairobi as a political prize to be gained, while Mogadishu was a comparative sanctuary for the top political leadership, whose population should not be unduly antagonised.

This work is an output of the African Cities Research Consortium

Citation

Bukenya, B, Kelsall, T, Klopp, J, Mukwaya, P, Oyana, T, Wekesa, E and Ziraba, A (2022). Understanding the politics of Covid-19 in Kampala, Nairobi and Mogadishu: A political settlements approach. ACRC Working Paper 2022-04. Manchester: African Cities Research Consortium, The University of Manchester.

Updates to this page

Published 1 May 2022