RDRM35245 - Remittance basis: Amounts remitted: Mixed funds: Remittances from mixed fund: Payment of remittance basis charge
Olga鈥檚 tax bill for 2008-09 is 拢188,000. She arranges for payment of 拢282,000 to be made direct to HMRC from her Guernsey bank account which is a mixed fund. 拢30,000 of the payment relates to the Remittance Basis Charge (RBC) for 2008-2009 and 拢15,000 to payment on account of the RBC for 2009-2010.
As Olga has made the payment from a mixed fund, she must analyse the mixed fund to establish what it is that she has brought to the UK to ascertain whether there is a taxable remittance (that is whether Condition B of ITA07 s809L is met) and what qualifies for exemption available under ITA07 s809V.
Immediately before the payment of 拢282,000 was made to HMRC Olga鈥檚 Guernsey bank account contained the following:
At 5 April 2008 鈥� Foreign Income 拢1,245.500
Capital 拢2,130,000
On 19 April 2008 a bequest under the Will of Olga鈥檚 aunt of 拢50,000 is paid into the account
On 30 June 2008 interest of 拢63,000 is credited to the account
On 28 August 2008 foreign dividend income of 拢65,100 is paid into the account
On 14 November 2008 拢75,000 is paid into the account representing Olga鈥檚 bonus from her UK employment
On 31 December 2008 interest of 拢65,610 is credited to the account
No payments or withdrawals were made during 2009-2010.
The ordering rules in ITA07 s809Q(3) and (4) (see RDRM35200) establish that the 拢282,000 brought to the UK represents a remittance of:
UK employment income 2008-2009 拢75,000
Relevant foreign income 2008-2009 拢193,710 (拢63,000 + 拢65,100 + 拢65,610)
Capital 2008-2009 拢13,290 (part of the inheritance of 拢50,000)
Total 拢282,000
There is a taxable remittance of 拢193,710. However, Olga is entitled to exemption in respect of money brought to the UK to pay the RBC so, it is necessary to identify what part of the remittance relates to payment of the RBC, which qualifies for exemption, and what part relates to the remainder of the tax bill.
There are no statutory rules to determine the position so once the ordering rules have been applied Olga can allocate the identified sources in the way most beneficial to herself. In the example above Olga would treat the RBC as having been paid out of relevant foreign income (the interest and foreign dividends) leaving her general tax liability as having been paid out of interest and foreign dividends of 拢148,710, UK employment income of 拢75,000 and capital of 拢13,290. As such, the taxable remittance is restricted to 拢148,710.
Note 鈥� If Olga makes a payment of exactly 拢45,000 from the mixed fund, she must still complete the analysis to identify what she has brought to the UK, because the relevant amounts must be eliminated from the mixed fund so that the revised state of the mixed fund is known for future withdrawals from the fund.