EM2962 - Examining Accounts: Cash-Flow Tests

‘Minus Cash� - Week 1

Cash transactions are isolated as follows

Ìý Ìý Ìý Ìý
Week 1 £ £ £
Recorded: cash brought forward 200 Ìý Ìý
### Takings as recorded Ìý Ìý Ìý
Monday 140 Ìý Ìý
Tuesday 162 Ìý Ìý
Wednesday 84 Ìý Ìý
Thursday 175 Ìý Ìý
Friday 182 Ìý Ìý
Saturday 276 1019 Ìý
### Cash available (brought forward and recorded) Ìý 1219 Ìý
### Cash payments as recorded: Ìý Ìý Ìý
Monday : Sundries 35 Ìý Ìý
Tuesday: Sundries 10 Ìý Ìý
Windows 15 Ìý Ìý
Wednesday: - Ìý Ìý
Thursday: Sundries - Ìý Ìý
Friday: Casual wages 120 Ìý Ìý
Saturday: Own drawings 180 Ìý Ìý
### Total Cash payments (360) Ìý Ìý
Bankings: Ìý Ìý Ìý
Wednesday: 400 Ìý Ìý
Friday 400 Ìý Ìý
### Total Banked (800) Ìý Ìý
Cash carried forward (200) Ìý Ìý
Cash used (spent, banked, carried forward) Ìý (1360) Ìý
Deficiency (used - less available) Ìý (141) Ìý

Casual wages and payments into the bank are capable of independent verification, drawings are unlikely to be overstated and sundries even if overstated are not large enough to have created the deficiency. The explanation for most if not all of it will be, one or both of

  • all takings were not recorded or
  • the amount brought forward or carried forward was incorrect.

If own drawings have been understated, the real deficiency will in fact be greater.

(This content has been withheld because of exemptions in the Freedom of Information Act 2000)

A cash test run to the banking date (Friday) would still show a deficiency even assuming that all Friday’s takings were available for banking and no cash was carried forward to Saturday, that is

Ìý Ìý Ìý
Cash available up to Friday (£200 + £743) £943 Ìý
Cash used to Friday £180 Ìý
Plus banked £800 (£980)
Deficiency (£37) Ìý
An unexplained ‘surplusâ€� would arise on Saturday, that is Ìý Ìý
Takings 276 Ìý
Own drawings (180) Ìý
Alleged carried forward (60) Ìý
‘S³Ü°ù±è±ô³Ü²õâ€� 36 Ìý