188体育

This example illustrates the principle that you do not adjust the matching of capital payments and section 2(2) amounts in the transferee settlement if the section 2(2) amounts are increased on a transfer.

All the settled property of the transferor settlement is transferred to the transferee settlement for nil consideration in 2012-13. No capital payments have been made out of the transferor settlement. The transferor settlement has the following gains made by the trustees:

Year	-	Amount
2005-06	Trustees鈥� gains (section 2(2) amount)	拢20,000
2012-13	Section 2(2) amount on transfer of all settled property	拢75,000

The transferee settlement acquires these unmatched section 2(2) amounts. They are added to any unmatched section 2(2) amounts it already has. This applies whatever the residence status of the transferee settlement.

The unmatched section 2(2) amounts in the transferor settlement are now reduced to Nil.

In its own right the transferee settlement had:

Year	-	Amount
2001-02	Trustees鈥� gains (section 2(2) amount)	拢10,000
2004-05	Capital payments	拢30,000
2006-07	Trustees鈥� gains (section 2(2) amount)	拢50,000

This has resulted in chargeable gains treated as accruing to the beneficiary of:

Year	Amount	-
2004-05	拢10,000	(Also possible increase in tax charged under TCGA92/S91)
2006-07	拢20,000	-

There is no reworking of this matching when section 2(2) amounts are transferred from the transferor settlement. So the 2005-06 section 2(2) amount transferred in is not matched with any of the 2004-05 capital payments. The transferee settlement has unmatched section 2(2) amounts to carry forward of:

Year	Amount	-
2005-06	拢20,000	From transferor settlement
2006-07	拢30,000	In its own right
2012-13	拢75,000	From transferor settlement