Secretary of State offers an insight into UK defence thinking
Speech by Michael Fallon, Secretary of State for Defence.

It鈥檚 good to see so many of you here today and I鈥檓 proud to know that we have some 50 nations represented in this room.
Today is a chance for me to give you an insight into our UK defence thinking at present.
But it鈥檚 also an opportunity to pick your brains.
Great challenges require great military minds
鈥nd when we have so many brilliant brains in the room
鈥e can鈥檛 fail to come up with some solutions.
Challenges
Let me return to the challenges we鈥檙e facing.
As our National Security Strategy identified not long ago.
鈥he world is becoming more dangerous and uncertain
鈥ith the interconnected threats we鈥檙e facing
鈥ncreasing in scale, diversity and complexity
Our strategy identified a number of issues likely to preoccupy us in the coming decade
鈥ncreasing terrorism, exemplified by Daesh
鈥he resurgence of state based threats, such as Putin鈥檚 Russia
鈥nd the rise of technology, especially cyber
鈥hich as the attacks on TV stations and banks in recent months show鈥oses a very real threat.
Taken together these dangers are destabilising the rules based order and undermining our security and prosperity.
In the past few months we鈥檝e been also reminded of other interrelated issues putting our system under further strain.
Rogue nations like north Korea are testing nuclear weapons
鈥nd a huge migration is spilling into the Med
鈥nd testing Europe鈥檚 commitment to free movement
Response
In response to these challenges the UK government set out a comprehensive strategy with overriding national security objectives:
- protecting our people
- projecting our global influence
- promoting our prosperity
To deliver those priorities we鈥檝e chosen to invest in bigger, bolder defence
鈥pending 2%, to grow our budget year on year
鈥nd using an augmented 拢178 billion equipment plan
鈥o fit out a larger joint expeditionary force backed up
鈥ith new carriers, more F35 earlier, maritime patrol vessels, successor submarines and Ajax Armoured Vehicle.
I鈥檓 sure you鈥檙e up to speed on the contents of our National Security Strategy.
So let me make 3 points about our approach
Active
First, it鈥檚 about being more active.
We need to be able to respond to multiple threats on many concurrent fronts.
Last year we took part in more than 20 operations in 19 countries.
This year we鈥檙e maintaining that operational energy.
UK鈥檚 Typhoons will be back in eastern Europe for the third time
鈥olicing Baltic skies
We鈥檒l be intensifying our efforts in NATO exercises
鈥� sending more than 1,000 troops
鈥o support Exercises Anaconda and Swift Response
鈥ased in Poland and the Baltic states
We鈥檙e playing a major role in defeating Daesh.
And following the decisive Parliamentary vote, our planes are now striking the terrorists.
In Syria as well as Iraq.
We鈥檙e also leading the coalition鈥檚 strategic communications work as well
鈥xposing the evil nature of the extremists
At the same time we鈥檙e doubling UN peacekeeping effort.
At Christmas I was in Nigeria meeting our forces helping the government it is fight against Boko Haram.
Integrated
Secondly, our approach is about becoming more integrated.
At a time of increasing demands
鈥hen the threats facing us as a country transcend departmental boundaries
鈥e鈥檝e recognised the need to take a 鈥渨hole government鈥� response
鈥o-ordinating effort across Whitehall departments
That鈥檚 why we conduct not strategic defence reviews but strategic defence and security reviews.
鈥ombining our National Security Strategy
And it鈥檚 why we now have bodies such as the National Security Council
鈥roviding collective strategic leadership across Whitehall
鈥n national security and crisis issues
Our integrated approach isn鈥檛 just illustrated by new structures
鈥ut by our response on the ground
Look at the way we dealt with Ebola in Sierra Leone.
Our armed forces built treatment centres
鈥hat were staffed by NHS volunteers
鈥elivering life saving care.
While staff from our development department and FCO
鈥longside our charities
鈥ot out into the villages
鈥o educate local people about prevention.
Significantly, this work and our Afghanistan operation made increasing use of stabilisation units
鈥ombining civilian and military effort to build stability overseas
In fact, we鈥檝e come to the view that defence and development are two sides of the same coin.
You can鈥檛 tackle extremism without tackling the instability that feeds it.
Which is why we鈥檙e the only major country in the world not just meeting the NATO target.
鈥ut spending at least 0.7% on development
And we鈥檙e now applying our integrated template to the policy arena.
This year we鈥檙e creating a number of new policy making and delivery Joint Units.
鈥ringing together diplomatic and defence expertise to develop and implement UK policy for NATO and for EU Common Security and Defence Policy
鈥oining up defence and the FCO to formulate UK policy on UN peacekeeping missions
鈥nd consolidating our approach to arms and counter proliferation into a single place鈥ere at MOD.
Battle of ideas
But perhaps the most interesting area where this joined up approach is being employed
鈥s in the battle of ideas
Today we鈥檙e seeing countries and religions
鈥ho feel they have been denied their due place in the world
鈥ecoming increasing assertive
鈥ooking to redraw the map and aggressively impose their views
So our security depends as much on winning the argument as it does on winning the fight.
That requires unity of purpose
鈥nd a total cross government response
This is precisely how we鈥檙e now tackling Islamist extremism.
We鈥檙e not just looking to target the terrorists
鈥hut down their online presence
鈥top their financial support
鈥nd prevent their fighters crossing our borders
We鈥檙e looking to call out their extremist narrative
鈥upporting reforming voices within the Muslim community to put a moderate perspective
鈥topping the apologists from painting this as a clash between Islam and the west
鈥nd preventing the fusion of religion and politics鈥ollowed by the swift slide into radicalisation
But we鈥檙e also looking to do something else.
We鈥檙e looking to make our case
鈥s a proud nation with much to offer the world
A nation that offers its citizens
鈥reedom from discrimination
鈥eligious tolerance
鈥nd opportunity for all鈥hatever your class, creed or colour
Challenges
Yet we face a significant barrier in getting our messages across.
Our enemies
鈥nencumbered by truth
鈥re able to use social media
鈥sing other cyber tools to instantly pump out their malignant messages
鈥o distort evidence in a Babel of voices
鈥hile we are hampered by our need to check every fact
So we鈥檙e having to develop better strategic communication that allow us to deliver a faster truth.
Taken together our new integrated approach is revolutionising defence and government.
My military colleagues are now having to get used to the sensation of feeling somewhat less independent.
On the other they鈥檙e revelling in getting a seat at a bigger table
鈥uaranteeing them greater influence
National resilience planning is one such area.
Instead of just being called out when the storm hits
鈥ilitary planners are being embedded in key government departments
鈥o their vital expertise is plugged into the contingency solution
International
My third point continues the theme of integration.
But it is about integration at an international level with allies and partners.
We can鈥檛 deliver our national security goals and tackle global threats without their support.
So the UK is now looking to become international-by-design
鈥nd work far more closely with our allies and partners.
NATO
You鈥檒l see us鈥n the coming year鈥oing even more to modernise NATO鈥he cornerstone of our defence
At the last NATO summit I attended in Wales
鈥arack Obama and David Cameron called on the alliance
鈥� to address the lack of investment鈥�
鈥anger of equipment obsolescence
鈥nd need for faster response
Since then seven nations have pledged to increase their spending and put together rapid reaction force
鈥ith the UK setting the pace
鈥ommitting to 2%
鈥� and leading the Spearhead Force in 2017.
But as we look ahead to the Warsaw conference in a few months鈥� time
鈥� big challenges remain
We need to galvanise the alliance
Not only do we need it to live up to the commitments made at the last summit.
Not only must we provide a strong response to Russia
鈥� and decide how NATO can respond to threats on its Southern flank.
But we have to make sure NATO continues to evolve and adapt, military, politically and institutionally, so it鈥檚 capable of dealing with whatever is thrown at it.
In particular, we have the grander鈥o less vital task鈥� of reinventing deterrence for the 21st century.
Making sure it can deal with
鈥ot just with traditional military aggression but the hybrid challenge鈥f war waged through proxies
鈥nd cyber attack, which blurs the line between military and civilian
EU
The UK isn鈥檛 just committed to NATO.
We鈥檙e pressing for a more coherent European security architecture
鈥hat sees the EU and NATO properly coordinated
鈥ith both playing to their strengths
We鈥檝e seen the effect EU economic sanctions have had on Russia
鈥nd the security co-operation that followed in the wake of Paris
We鈥檝e also seen the EU and NATO make good progress on strategic communications and countering the hybrid warfare threat.
But we must sure this new found sense of coherence continues
Worldwide footprint
Besides upping our impetus on the multi-lateral front
鈥e鈥檙e also expanding our worldwide footprint to ensure we can continue having a global impact
When the problems arise we need to be able to react quickly.
That鈥檚 why we鈥檙e leading on the Joint Expeditionary Force.
鈥� with our Baltic, Danish, Dutch and Norwegian friends
鈥llowing us to rapidly deploy a specialist force in the event of crisis.
And our fleet of foot will also be significantly enhanced through our UK/France Combined Joint Expeditionary Force which stands up this year.
Meanwhile, our partnership with the US and Germany鈥� in the Transatlantic Capability Enhancement and Training initiative (TACET) which will improve our understanding of the situation in the east and again improve our ability to respond.
Projecting power is one thing.
But we also need to be able to project the influence that can spot trouble down the track
鈥nd head it off before crisis turns to chaos
We鈥檙e working hard right across the world.
We鈥檙e building a naval base in Bahrain to magnify the support we can provide across the Gulf.
We鈥檙e doing more in Asia, getting more out of our forces in Brunei working with Singapore, Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand to improve our 5 powers defence arrangement and engaging regional allies such as Japan and India
We鈥檙e reinforcing our on-going engagement with south American defence partners.
And we鈥檙e now creating British Defence Staffs in the Middle East, Asia Pacific and Africa
鈥iving us an enduring footprint across those regions.
Conclusion: questions
But talk of defence diplomacy brings me back to you.
If there鈥檚 one thing more important than money or kit to international work
鈥t鈥檚 dialogue.
Only by sitting down together
鈥iscussing the issues we face鈥n an academic forum such as this
鈥an we hope to come up with some collective solutions
So in a break with the traditions of a speech
鈥hich require you to ask me questions at the end
鈥鈥檇 like to pose you a few questions first.
Developing some of themes I鈥檝e discussed.
How can we develop a 21st century deterrence posture with a clearer understanding of the types of activity that can threaten a nation?
How can we ensure an effective collective response to such challenges?
And how can we work together to put out that faster truth so necessary in winning the great battle of ideas?
As with any diplomatic engagement, getting an immediate answer isn鈥檛 the point
Having the conversation is what counts.