Speech

Secretary of State offers an insight into UK defence thinking

Speech by Michael Fallon, Secretary of State for Defence.

This was published under the 2015 to 2016 Cameron Conservative government
The Rt Hon Sir Michael Fallon

It鈥檚 good to see so many of you here today and I鈥檓 proud to know that we have some 50 nations represented in this room.

Today is a chance for me to give you an insight into our UK defence thinking at present.

But it鈥檚 also an opportunity to pick your brains.

Great challenges require great military minds

鈥nd when we have so many brilliant brains in the room

鈥e can鈥檛 fail to come up with some solutions.

Challenges

Let me return to the challenges we鈥檙e facing.

As our National Security Strategy identified not long ago.

鈥he world is becoming more dangerous and uncertain

鈥ith the interconnected threats we鈥檙e facing

鈥ncreasing in scale, diversity and complexity

Our strategy identified a number of issues likely to preoccupy us in the coming decade

鈥ncreasing terrorism, exemplified by Daesh

鈥he resurgence of state based threats, such as Putin鈥檚 Russia

鈥nd the rise of technology, especially cyber

鈥hich as the attacks on TV stations and banks in recent months show鈥oses a very real threat.

Taken together these dangers are destabilising the rules based order and undermining our security and prosperity.

In the past few months we鈥檝e been also reminded of other interrelated issues putting our system under further strain.

Rogue nations like north Korea are testing nuclear weapons

鈥nd a huge migration is spilling into the Med

鈥nd testing Europe鈥檚 commitment to free movement

Response

In response to these challenges the UK government set out a comprehensive strategy with overriding national security objectives:

  • protecting our people
  • projecting our global influence
  • promoting our prosperity

To deliver those priorities we鈥檝e chosen to invest in bigger, bolder defence

鈥pending 2%, to grow our budget year on year

鈥nd using an augmented 拢178 billion equipment plan

鈥o fit out a larger joint expeditionary force backed up

鈥ith new carriers, more F35 earlier, maritime patrol vessels, successor submarines and Ajax Armoured Vehicle.

I鈥檓 sure you鈥檙e up to speed on the contents of our National Security Strategy.

So let me make 3 points about our approach

Active

First, it鈥檚 about being more active.

We need to be able to respond to multiple threats on many concurrent fronts.

Last year we took part in more than 20 operations in 19 countries.

This year we鈥檙e maintaining that operational energy.

UK鈥檚 Typhoons will be back in eastern Europe for the third time

鈥olicing Baltic skies

We鈥檒l be intensifying our efforts in NATO exercises

鈥� sending more than 1,000 troops

鈥o support Exercises Anaconda and Swift Response

鈥ased in Poland and the Baltic states

We鈥檙e playing a major role in defeating Daesh.

And following the decisive Parliamentary vote, our planes are now striking the terrorists.

In Syria as well as Iraq.

We鈥檙e also leading the coalition鈥檚 strategic communications work as well

鈥xposing the evil nature of the extremists

At the same time we鈥檙e doubling UN peacekeeping effort.

At Christmas I was in Nigeria meeting our forces helping the government it is fight against Boko Haram.

Integrated

Secondly, our approach is about becoming more integrated.

At a time of increasing demands

鈥hen the threats facing us as a country transcend departmental boundaries

鈥e鈥檝e recognised the need to take a 鈥渨hole government鈥� response

鈥o-ordinating effort across Whitehall departments

That鈥檚 why we conduct not strategic defence reviews but strategic defence and security reviews.

鈥ombining our National Security Strategy

And it鈥檚 why we now have bodies such as the National Security Council

鈥roviding collective strategic leadership across Whitehall

鈥n national security and crisis issues

Our integrated approach isn鈥檛 just illustrated by new structures

鈥ut by our response on the ground

Look at the way we dealt with Ebola in Sierra Leone.

Our armed forces built treatment centres

鈥hat were staffed by NHS volunteers

鈥elivering life saving care.

While staff from our development department and FCO

鈥longside our charities

鈥ot out into the villages

鈥o educate local people about prevention.

Significantly, this work and our Afghanistan operation made increasing use of stabilisation units

鈥ombining civilian and military effort to build stability overseas

In fact, we鈥檝e come to the view that defence and development are two sides of the same coin.

You can鈥檛 tackle extremism without tackling the instability that feeds it.

Which is why we鈥檙e the only major country in the world not just meeting the NATO target.

鈥ut spending at least 0.7% on development

And we鈥檙e now applying our integrated template to the policy arena.

This year we鈥檙e creating a number of new policy making and delivery Joint Units.

鈥ringing together diplomatic and defence expertise to develop and implement UK policy for NATO and for EU Common Security and Defence Policy

鈥oining up defence and the FCO to formulate UK policy on UN peacekeeping missions

鈥nd consolidating our approach to arms and counter proliferation into a single place鈥ere at MOD.

Battle of ideas

But perhaps the most interesting area where this joined up approach is being employed

鈥s in the battle of ideas

Today we鈥檙e seeing countries and religions

鈥ho feel they have been denied their due place in the world

鈥ecoming increasing assertive

鈥ooking to redraw the map and aggressively impose their views

So our security depends as much on winning the argument as it does on winning the fight.

That requires unity of purpose

鈥nd a total cross government response

This is precisely how we鈥檙e now tackling Islamist extremism.

We鈥檙e not just looking to target the terrorists

鈥hut down their online presence

鈥top their financial support

鈥nd prevent their fighters crossing our borders

We鈥檙e looking to call out their extremist narrative

鈥upporting reforming voices within the Muslim community to put a moderate perspective

鈥topping the apologists from painting this as a clash between Islam and the west

鈥nd preventing the fusion of religion and politics鈥ollowed by the swift slide into radicalisation

But we鈥檙e also looking to do something else.

We鈥檙e looking to make our case

鈥s a proud nation with much to offer the world

A nation that offers its citizens

鈥reedom from discrimination

鈥eligious tolerance

鈥nd opportunity for all鈥hatever your class, creed or colour

Challenges

Yet we face a significant barrier in getting our messages across.

Our enemies

鈥nencumbered by truth

鈥re able to use social media

鈥sing other cyber tools to instantly pump out their malignant messages

鈥o distort evidence in a Babel of voices

鈥hile we are hampered by our need to check every fact

So we鈥檙e having to develop better strategic communication that allow us to deliver a faster truth.

Taken together our new integrated approach is revolutionising defence and government.

My military colleagues are now having to get used to the sensation of feeling somewhat less independent.

On the other they鈥檙e revelling in getting a seat at a bigger table

鈥uaranteeing them greater influence

National resilience planning is one such area.

Instead of just being called out when the storm hits

鈥ilitary planners are being embedded in key government departments

鈥o their vital expertise is plugged into the contingency solution

International

My third point continues the theme of integration.

But it is about integration at an international level with allies and partners.

We can鈥檛 deliver our national security goals and tackle global threats without their support.

So the UK is now looking to become international-by-design

鈥nd work far more closely with our allies and partners.

NATO

You鈥檒l see us鈥n the coming year鈥oing even more to modernise NATO鈥he cornerstone of our defence

At the last NATO summit I attended in Wales

鈥arack Obama and David Cameron called on the alliance

鈥� to address the lack of investment鈥�

鈥anger of equipment obsolescence

鈥nd need for faster response

Since then seven nations have pledged to increase their spending and put together rapid reaction force

鈥ith the UK setting the pace

鈥ommitting to 2%

鈥� and leading the Spearhead Force in 2017.

But as we look ahead to the Warsaw conference in a few months鈥� time

鈥� big challenges remain

We need to galvanise the alliance

Not only do we need it to live up to the commitments made at the last summit.

Not only must we provide a strong response to Russia

鈥� and decide how NATO can respond to threats on its Southern flank.

But we have to make sure NATO continues to evolve and adapt, military, politically and institutionally, so it鈥檚 capable of dealing with whatever is thrown at it.

In particular, we have the grander鈥o less vital task鈥� of reinventing deterrence for the 21st century.

Making sure it can deal with

鈥ot just with traditional military aggression but the hybrid challenge鈥f war waged through proxies

鈥nd cyber attack, which blurs the line between military and civilian

EU

The UK isn鈥檛 just committed to NATO.

We鈥檙e pressing for a more coherent European security architecture

鈥hat sees the EU and NATO properly coordinated

鈥ith both playing to their strengths

We鈥檝e seen the effect EU economic sanctions have had on Russia

鈥nd the security co-operation that followed in the wake of Paris

We鈥檝e also seen the EU and NATO make good progress on strategic communications and countering the hybrid warfare threat.

But we must sure this new found sense of coherence continues

Worldwide footprint

Besides upping our impetus on the multi-lateral front

鈥e鈥檙e also expanding our worldwide footprint to ensure we can continue having a global impact

When the problems arise we need to be able to react quickly.

That鈥檚 why we鈥檙e leading on the Joint Expeditionary Force.

鈥� with our Baltic, Danish, Dutch and Norwegian friends

鈥llowing us to rapidly deploy a specialist force in the event of crisis.

And our fleet of foot will also be significantly enhanced through our UK/France Combined Joint Expeditionary Force which stands up this year.

Meanwhile, our partnership with the US and Germany鈥� in the Transatlantic Capability Enhancement and Training initiative (TACET) which will improve our understanding of the situation in the east and again improve our ability to respond.

Projecting power is one thing.

But we also need to be able to project the influence that can spot trouble down the track

鈥nd head it off before crisis turns to chaos

We鈥檙e working hard right across the world.

We鈥檙e building a naval base in Bahrain to magnify the support we can provide across the Gulf.

We鈥檙e doing more in Asia, getting more out of our forces in Brunei working with Singapore, Malaysia, Australia and New Zealand to improve our 5 powers defence arrangement and engaging regional allies such as Japan and India

We鈥檙e reinforcing our on-going engagement with south American defence partners.

And we鈥檙e now creating British Defence Staffs in the Middle East, Asia Pacific and Africa

鈥iving us an enduring footprint across those regions.

Conclusion: questions

But talk of defence diplomacy brings me back to you.

If there鈥檚 one thing more important than money or kit to international work

鈥t鈥檚 dialogue.

Only by sitting down together

鈥iscussing the issues we face鈥n an academic forum such as this

鈥an we hope to come up with some collective solutions

So in a break with the traditions of a speech

鈥hich require you to ask me questions at the end

鈥鈥檇 like to pose you a few questions first.

Developing some of themes I鈥檝e discussed.

How can we develop a 21st century deterrence posture with a clearer understanding of the types of activity that can threaten a nation?

How can we ensure an effective collective response to such challenges?

And how can we work together to put out that faster truth so necessary in winning the great battle of ideas?

As with any diplomatic engagement, getting an immediate answer isn鈥檛 the point

Having the conversation is what counts.

Updates to this page

Published 5 February 2016