Speech

Russia's war in Ukraine: Joint statement on OSCE's second independent Moscow Mechanism report

On behalf of 46 OSCE states, Albanian Ambassador Gjermeni thanks the three experts for a second independent OSCE report on Russia's war in Ukraine.

This was published under the 2019 to 2022 Johnson Conservative government
OSCE

Thank you Mr. Chairperson,

I am delivering this statement on behalf of my own country Albania and 45 other participating States: Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, T眉rkiye, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Mr. Chairperson,

On 11 July OSCE participating States received聽the . The report documents violations of international humanitarian law, and violations and abuses of human rights law, that may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Ukraine between 1 April and 25 June 2022.

The mandate for the experts was to:

Consider, follow up and build on the findings of addressing 鈥渉uman rights and humanitarian impacts of the Russian Federation鈥檚 invasion and acts of war, supported by Belarus, on the people of Ukraine, within Ukraine鈥檚 internationally recognized borders.鈥�

We also requested that ODIHR provide any relevant information or documentation derived from the mission to other appropriate accountability mechanisms, as well as national, regional, or international courts or tribunals that have, or may in future have, jurisdiction.

Our collective invocation of the Moscow Mechanism on June 2, 2022, with the support of Ukraine, reflected our shared concerns about the impact of Russia鈥檚 invasion in Ukraine.

While our capitals and delegations are still reviewing the 115-page report in detail, we would like to highlight a number of critical conclusions made by the experts in the report.

This report has shone a light on two new alarming trends.

The first is the reported 鈥渆stablishment and use of so-called filtration centres [鈥 by the Russian armed forces鈥�. 鈥� Civilians are detained for at least 30 days as part of a filtration process, with those deemed the most 鈥渦ntrustworthy鈥� [鈥 obliged to remain for two months.鈥�

The second trend is the reported tendency of the 鈥淩ussian Federation to bypass its international obligations by handing detained persons over to the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People鈥檚 Republics and letting these two de facto entities engage in problematic practices, including the imposition of the death penalty resulting from trials that fail to meet the basic standards of the fair trial.鈥� These entities have no international or domestic legal authority.

Furthermore, the second mission has 鈥渓argely confirmed the conclusions reached by the first mission. It has discovered clear patterns of serious violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) attributable mostly to Russian armed forces in many areas which its investigations referred to.鈥� The report emphasises 鈥渢he magnitude and frequency of the indiscriminate attacks carried out against civilians and civilian objects.鈥� The events concerning the towns of Bucha and Irpin, which were visited by the mission, are two emblematic examples of these grave violations.

The independent experts note that Russia鈥檚 invasion has impacted both on Ukraine鈥檚 food security and global food security - exacerbated by the theft of Ukrainian grain and the suspension of movement of commercial vessels in the Sea of Azov.

As the report notes, 鈥渕illions of tons of grain remain trapped in the Ukrainian ports and on ships unable to move, which significantly affects the global food and agricultural supplies threatening to result in a global hunger crisis.鈥�

In terms of recommendations for additional actions, the report expands on the linkages between the Moscow Mechanism report and other accountability mechanisms and notes the role played by justice institutions.

Mr. Chairperson,

We would like to thank Professors Bilkova, Guercio and Sancin for their tireless work in preparing this report in such a short period of time. As stated, this report will require careful consideration and study, in the OSCE region and beyond. The broad conclusions, however, are presented in a clear and compelling manner. We would like to express our support to Ukraine and its citizens. Now participating States and the international community must ensure we undertake the necessary actions 鈥� this includes making full use of the OSCE and its tools under the human dimension.

Thank you Mr Chair, and I ask that this statement be attached to the journal of the day.

Updates to this page

Published 14 July 2022