Independent report

Presumption that a disease is due to the nature of employment: the role of rebuttal in claims assessment: IIAC report

A review of the role of rebuttal in claims assessment and its relation to the presumption that a disease is due to the nature of employment.

Documents

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

The Industrial Injuries Advisory Council (IIAC) has reviewed the evidence base for each prescribed disease. It has recommended changes to guidance about whether presumption, where it applies within the industrial injuries scheme, should be automatic and not be subject to rebuttal. The council recognises the need to retain the flexibility to rebut claims where it is clearly appropriate to do so and has not recommended any legislative changes.

Updates to this page

Published 5 March 2015

Sign up for emails or print this page