Policy paper

HS2: strategic case

Sets out strategic reasons for building HS2; the new north to south high speed rail line between London, Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester.

This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government

Documents

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

鈥楾he strategic case for HS2鈥� explains why the government has concluded that HS2 is the best way to meet the challenge of an increasingly overcrowded transport network.

It shows how HS2 will transform inter-city travel, radically improve commuter services into London and our other major cities; increase the amount of freight carried by rail as well as supporting economic growth and making a major contribution to rebalancing the economy.

For a straighforward overview of the strategic case for HS2, read our Investing in Britain鈥檚 future: why we need HS2 leaflet.

Related information about the strategic case for HS2 is also available on 188体育.

Clarifications

This table features clarifications regarding 鈥楾he strategic case鈥� document.

Printed document Clarification Reason
Figure 8 on page 20 and figure 3.1 on page 68 (footnotes 29 and124) show the source as the Department for Transport and Atkins Figure 8 on page 20 and figure 3.1 on page 68 (footnotes 29 and125) should show the source as the Department for Transport and Steer Davies Gleave The source quoted for these figures was incorrect
Figure 9 on page 22 has the text 鈥淭hese options provide a limited capacity鈥� This text should not have appeared This text is incorrect and does not refer to these graphs
Figure 6.1 on page 127 (footnote 185) 鈥� the source is listed as Atkins and HS2 Ltd Figure 6.1 (footnote 185) 鈥� the source should be Steer Davies Gleave and HS2 Ltd The source quoted for this figure was incorrect
Table 6.7 on p136 shows the HS2 Phase One cost as 拢21.4 billion and HS2 both Phases cost as 拢42.6 billion HS2 Phase One cost should show 拢19.4 billion and HS2 Both Phases cost should show 拢38.4 billion The figures should be as in Figure 6.6

Updates to this page

Published 29 October 2013

Sign up for emails or print this page