Ofsted inspections: myths
Updated 28 February 2019
Applies to England
漏 Crown copyright 2019
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected].
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at /government/publications/further-education-and-skills-inspection-handbook/ofsted-inspections-myths
This document is under review and some information may not be current.
The purpose of this document is to confirm facts about the requirements of Ofsted and to dispel myths that can result in unnecessary workloads in colleges. It should be read alongside the Further education and skills inspection handbook.
This document is intended to highlight specific practices that are not required by Ofsted. It is up to colleges themselves to determine their practices. Leadership teams should justify these on their own merits rather than by reference to the inspection handbook.
1. Teaching style
Ofsted doesn鈥檛 prescribe any particular teaching style. We know that different things work for different teachers and trainers. Inspectors are only interested in how much progress students make.
2. Lesson plans
Inspectors will not expect to see lesson plans. They will judge overall how well lessons are planned, but aren鈥檛 interested in the specific form of that planning. They鈥檒l evaluate the impact of the planning, not the paperwork.
3. Equality and diversity
Inspectors don鈥檛 expect all aspects of equality and diversity to be promoted as explicit features in every lesson. Inspectors want evidence that, during a student鈥檚 time at college, they will benefit from equality of opportunity. There should also be evidence that they learn about the complex multicultural world they鈥檒l live and work in.
4. Limiting grades
Ofsted doesn鈥檛 regard English, mathematics and work experience as limiting grades on study programmes.
5. Differentiation
Inspectors don鈥檛 expect work and tasks in all lessons to be tailored to meet each student鈥檚 individual abilities. This is an unrealistic expectation. However, teachers should make sure that all students have opportunities to fulfil their potential, regardless of their starting points or abilities. Inspectors will expect to see evidence of this throughout the course as a whole.
6. Information and learning technology
Ofsted doesn鈥檛 expect to see information and learning technology (ILT) being used in every lesson. Inspectors, like teachers, see the potential impact that ILT can have on students鈥� learning. At the same time, we see no particular benefit from the use of ILT for its own sake.
7. Observations and grading
Ofsted doesn鈥檛 expect all teachers to be observed and graded by their colleges, to inform self-assessment and staff training. It鈥檚 entirely up to college leaders what mechanisms they use to improve the quality of teaching.