Transparency data

Board meeting minutes 28th January 2025 - The Planning Inspectorate

Updated 9 April 2025

Applies to England

Board meeting minutes 28th January 2025 - The Planning InspectorateÌý

Minutes ​ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌ� â€� â€�19th March 2025​Ì�

​Title of meeting Planning Inspectorate Board Meetings
DateÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý Ìý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý â€�28 January 2025​ÌýÌ� ÌýÌý
VenueÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý VirtualÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ChairÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý ​Trudi Elliottâ€� (TE), Non-Executive Director (NED) Ìý
ÌýÌýPresent
ÌýÌýEmir Feisal (EF), Non-Executive Director (NED)​ÌýÌ� ÌýÌý
ÌýÌý​​Oliver Munn (OM)â€�, Non-Executive Director (NED)ÌýÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýAdrian Penfold (AP), Non-Executive Director (NED)​ÌýÌýÌýÌ� ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýBaljit Dhillon (BD), Non-Executive Board ApprenticeÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýPaul Morrison (PM), Chief ExecutiveÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýGraham Stallwood (GS), Chief Operating Officer ÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌý​​Sean Canavanâ€� (SC), Chief Strategy OfficerÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýRachel Graham (RG), Chief Digital Information OfficerÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýHayley Kelly (HK), Chief People OfficerÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýRichard Schofield (RS), Chief Planning InspectorÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýJoanne Butcher (JB), Chief Finance OfficerÌýÌý ÌýÌý
ÌýÌýWill Burgon (WB), Director of Planning, MHCLGÌýÌý ÌýÌý
In attendance Full meeting
Executive Support and Governance Officer (DP), meeting supportÌýÌý Ìý
Corporate Governance Officer (NP), minutes and actionsÌýÌý Ìý
Arthur Young (MHCLG)ÌýÌý Ìý
ÌýAttending for specific itemsÌýÌý
Corporate Strategy and Reporting Lead (BM) (items 5, 7 & 9)ÌýÌý
Project and Change Management Lead (TJ) (items 5, 7 & 10)ÌýÌý
Head of Strategy and Change (SH) (items 5-10)ÌýÌý
Head of Business Improvement & Stakeholder Management (LB) (item 6)ÌýÌý
Lesley Cowley (LC), Board Effectiveness Reviewer (item 6)ÌýÌý
Head of Finance (PO), (items 7 & 8)ÌýÌý
Futures Lead (NPo), (items 8 & 9)ÌýÌý
Pay & Reward Lead (SM) (item 11)ÌýÌý

​�1.0 - Welcome and Declaration of Interests​�

​â€�1.1Ìý The Chair called for Declarations of Interest, of which there were none.

â€�1.2Ìý The Board welcomed BD to the Board as the new NED Boardroom Apprentice for 2025.Ìý

​�2.0 - Minutes of ​October and November Board meetings�, corporate action tracker and ARAC update

MinutesÌý

â€�2.1Ìý No further comments were received for the part one and part two of the October Board minutes and part two of the November Board minutes.Ìý

â€�2.2Ìý OM asked for the wording at 10.5 of the part one minutes to be revised and reflect OM was offering advice.Ìý

​ActionsÌý

â€�2.3Ìý EF suggested the action tracker is reviewed as some outstanding actions appear to be superseded.Ìý

​Appeal performance action update paperÌý

â€�2.4Ìý WB is interested in the appeal complexity aspects set out in the paper and would like a further meeting with TW and GS to discuss.Ìý

â€�2.5Ìý AP reflected appeal complexity is important and would value a deep dive session on the data and information available.Ìý

â€�2.6Ìý There are overlaps between the data presented to Board and the Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (ARAC).Ìý TE asked for this to be reviewed by BM.Ìý

​ARAC updateÌý

â€�2.7Ìý ARAC reviewed strategic risk, the materiality of risks and those outside of our appetite and tolerance.Ìý A further risk item will come to the April meeting to examine in more detail, 15% of risks are outside of the tolerance.Ìý

â€�2.8Ìý The Committee held a deep dive on assurance and achievements around people related issues.Ìý Focusing on organisation culture and mandatory training completion.Ìý

2.9Ìý The National Audit Office (NAO) audit planning report on the 2024/25 financial statements audit was reviewed.Ìý Ìý

â€�2.10Ìý Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) Counter Fraud audit gave the organisation a substantial rating, the Committee commended Executive Team for this rating.Ìý

â€�###´¡²µ°ù±ð±ð»å:

â€�2a)Ìý Subject to the amendments to the part one of the November Board minutes, the October parts one and two, and November parts one and two are an accurate record of the meeting.Ìý

​Actions:Ìý

â€�2b)Ìý NP to ensure action owners review, update and where necessary close actions ahead of the March Board.Ìý

â€�2c)Ìý NP to schedule a meeting for GS, TW and WB to discuss appeal complexity.Ìý

â€�2d)Ìý NP to discuss deep dive session with TW and GS covering appeal data with NEDs.Ìý

â€�2e)Ìý BM to review the data presented to Board and ARAC and reduce/ remove overlaps.Ìý

3.0 Chief Executive’s (CEO) update to the Board ​�

​​â€�3.1Ìý PM explained this is a critical period for the organisation, as we develop our business plan, prepare for the spending review and move to a service model to monitor our services.Ìý

â€�3.2Ìý The remainder of the update is recorded in the part two minutes.

​�##4.0 Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (MHCLG) update to the Board​�

4.1ÌýÌý WB updated since the November Board, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published in December.Ìý

â€�4.2Ìý The latest paper covering the infrastructure measures for the Bill was published which include changes to the National Policy Statement (NPS), this will impact the Inspectorate.Ìý Changes to the Develop Consent Order process is also included.Ìý

â€�4.3Ìý Work continues between the Inspectorate and MHCLG Sponsorship, finance and policy teams to contribute to the spending review commission, there is still work to do which is moving at pace to meet deadlines.Ìý

​�5.0 Balanced Scorecard, including review of performance reporting and productivity update ​�

​​â€�5.1Ìý BM is developing the balanced scorecard to align with the new business plan, service model and will also incorporate the feedback and recommendations from the Board effectiveness review (BER).Ìý BM proposed a deep dive session with the Board in February to review the new scorecard and measures.Ìý

â€�5.2Ìý We continue to receive less appeals, Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) and local plans than forecast year to date.Ìý

â€�5.3Ìý NSIPs continue to be decided within the statutory deadlines.Ìý There has been a reduction in the number of days per local plan examination, the target is being reviewed as part of the local plan reforms.Ìý

â€�5.4Ìý There has been positive year to date progress against hearing and inquiry timeliness, but we have seen a decline on written representations which is linked to resourcing.Ìý The measures do not demonstrate the progress being made to reduce the oldest cases in the system.Ìý

â€�5.5Ìý The unit cost measure for 2025/26 will be reviewed to include how we track the cost effectiveness of recruitment.Ìý

â€�5.6Ìý The overall delivery confidence against the mission is amber.Ìý Ìý

​â€�5.7Ìý OM reflected the positive achievements on examinations and hearing and inquiry performance and asked when will we see improvements in written representations and the run rate numbers.Ìý

â€�5.8Ìý PM explained we are on the track, we are removing the older cases from the system.Ìý GS said we will see improvements to enforcement written representation (WR) cases in the spring and improvements to planning WRs through the year.Ìý

â€�5.9Ìý OM said the current measures do not set out the story and should be replaced.Ìý As part of the scorecard review, BM explained the Service Owners are reviewing and setting out the measures they need to manage their service.Ìý ​​Ì�

6.0 Board Effectiveness Review (BER) Report ​�

6.1Ìý As part of the review, LC reviewed the recommendations from the previous board effectiveness review (BER) and conducted a review for this year.Ìý LC thanked all contributors for their time and openness and the secretariat for their support.Ìý

â€�6.2Ìý LC set out the findings demonstrated a good and effective board is in place.Ìý Concerns were raised as part of the previous review around the loss of three NEDs all at once.Ìý The latest review found the new NEDs brought skills and experience which are helpful and enabled a reset of the Board focus and ways of working.Ìý

â€�6.3Ìý LC found very good progress against delivery of the major recommendations from the previous review had been made.Ìý Through the interviews, concerns were raised which are consistent in the areas of change, LC made recommendations to address the areas raised.Ìý

â€�6.4Ìý AP referred to sections 4.5 and 4.6 of the report and agreed NEDs would like to be more involved in stakeholder engagement and this recommendation from the previous report needed further work.Ìý AP also supports the recommendation for more in person Board meetings, online meetings taking place by exception and the earlier distribution of papers would be helpful and welcome.Ìý

â€�6.5Ìý Whilst the recommendation to assess capability and resourcing gaps from the 2023/24 review was carried out as part of the business planning process, further concerns were raised through the interviews and questionnaire.Ìý Particularly around the appointments of the Chair and two of the three NEDs due to come to an end in 2026.Ìý Ìý

â€�6.6Ìý TE reflected the Board and Executive Team recognise the risk and support the recommendation to review Board succession and has already discussed timings with the MHCLG Sponsorship Team.Ìý TE has agreed to conduct a skill audit across the NEDs and to support the department with recruitment.Ìý AP agreed to share a model used before to conduct a skills audit.Ìý

â€�6.7Ìý AY agreed this will be an area of focus for the Sponsorship Team, it will be important to avoid the issues raised by TE.Ìý PM reflected as Accounting Officer; this is an area of concern.Ìý

â€�6.8Ìý Reflecting on stakeholder engagement and engagement with people in our organisation, TE asked the NEDs to attend a Business Plan session if they are available.Ìý Lots of work has taken place in the stakeholder and customer space, LB suggested a further session with the NEDs.Ìý

â€�###´¡²µ°ù±ð±ð»å:Ìý

â€�6a)Ìý To accept the report and endorsed the recommendations.Ìý

​Actions:Ìý

â€�6b)Ìý TE and NP to develop the action and implementation plans.Ìý

â€�6c)Ìý NP to share the links to the business plan sessions, NEDs to sign up if they can attend.Ìý

â€�6d)Ìý AP to share skills audit information with TE.Ìý

â€�6e)Ìý LB to hold a stakeholder and customer engagement session with Board.Ìý

7.0 Business Planning 2025/26 â€� OFFICIAL SENSITIVEÌý

7.1Ìý Recorded in the part two minutes.​Ì�

8.0 Spending Review � OFFICIAL SENSITIVE

â€�8.1Ìý Recorded in the part two minutes.â€�

​�##9.0 Future Strategy � OFFICIAL SENSITIVE

â€�9.1Ìý Recorded in the part two minutes.Ìý

​â€�10.0 Service ModelÌý

â€�10.1Ìý All aspects of the service model will be in place for the 1st April.Ìý There are five strands of work interlinked which include the PINS way, new service structure with named Service Owners, an increase in matrix management impacting 60 colleagues, reforms to governance and Executive Team agreeing the contracts with Service Owners.Ìý

â€�10.2Ìý Whilst there is a challenge to match the budgets to the services, JB explained the intention is there, changes to our current system are on hold as part of a wider change programme.Ìý

â€�10.3Ìý The introduction of Service Owners does not change the composition of the Executive Team.Ìý The Service Owners will report monthly to Executive Team with an escalation process in place if necessary.Ìý

â€�10.4Ìý SC took the opportunity to thank SH and TJ for all of their work in this space, with SH leading the team and linking to wider pieces of work.Ìý TE endorsed SC comments and commended the pace of delivery.Ìý

â€�###Actions:Ìý

â€�10a)Ìý SH to share with the Board a paper which sets out how the governance will operate.Ìý

​â€�##11.0 Gender Pay Gap (GPG)Ìý

11.1Ìý SM explained the GPG has moved up and down over the last seven years since reporting became a legal requirement. Ìý

â€�11.2Ìý The GPG in the organisation has closed by 1% and we are below the average.Ìý The reason behind our gap is structural and not across grades, it is driven by the demographic of the planning profession.Ìý

â€�11.3Ìý RG said our recruitment rounds are an opportunity to think about how we close the gap and encourage females into senior roles.Ìý SM reflected we may need to look at campaigns and how we can adjust and support females into roles.Ìý HK said we need to set out clearly the value of the employment offer, look at recruitment starting salaries and make sure there is a clear and consistent approach.Ìý TE reflected the gender differences will not change just through recruitment.Ìý

â€�###ActionsÌý

â€�11a)Ìý TE, JB, RG to have a conversation about the engagement of the women’s network in the GPG space.​Ì�

​â€�12.0 AOB, review of meeting, blog key pointsÌý

â€�12.1Ìý The Board agreed the following additions to the March forward look:Ìý

  • ​Review of the productivity improvement plan - GSÌý
  • ​Culture change/ delivery and how this links to the service model â€� HKÌý

â€�12.2Ìý The Board agreed a deep dive on AI would also be welcome, looking at our workforce and making sure we are tech enabled.Ìý

​Actions:Ìý

â€�12a) TE, OM, GS and JB to discuss timing of the productivity plan update alongside the timings of the audit report.Ìý

â€�12b)Ìý Board to review the high-level business plan approach.Ìý

â€�12c)Ìý WB to provide key points to RS for the blog.â€�