Consultation outcome

Inner Thames Estuary airport studies

This consultation has concluded

Detail of outcome

The outcome of this consultation is contained within the Inner Thames Estuary airport: summary and decision paper, published September 2014.

Feedback received

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detail of feedback received

The Airports Commission has published the 27 technical responses that it received for this consultation.


Original consultation

Summary

Seeks comment on the Airports Commission鈥檚 Inner Thames Estuary study outputs.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

The Airports Commission is seeking views on a number of Inner Thames Estuary study reports. Specifically, we are inviting responses in relation to 2 questions:

  • is there information in the reports which is factually inaccurate?
  • is there any new information or evidence that you wish us to consider before making our decision?

Documents

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Updates to this page

Published 4 July 2014
Last updated 2 September 2014 show all updates
  1. Link to outcome added.

  2. Remaining study reports published.

  3. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page