Consultation outcome

England Coast Path at Dunball Wharf and St Audries Bay: comment on proposals to change the approved route

Applies to England

This consultation has concluded

Detail of outcome

On 15 January 2016 the Secretary of State announced her decision to approve proposals to change the previously approved route for this stretch of coast in 2 places: Dunball Wharf and St Audries Bay.

For more information, see the section 52 notice for Dunball Wharf and St Audries Bay.


Original consultation

Summary

Find out about Natural England's proposals to vary the approved route of the Brean Down to Minehead stretch of the England Coast Path in Somerset and how to submit a representation or objection.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

On Thursday 24 September 2015, Natural England submitted a report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs setting out proposed changes to the approved route of the England Coast Path in Somerset at Dunball Wharf and St Audries Bay.

Read the variation report to find out why changes to the approved route are required.

Objections will be passed to an independent planning inspector who will make a recommendation to the Secretary of State about each one. The Secretary of State will consider all representations and objections before making a decision about Natural England鈥檚 proposals

Comment on Natural England鈥檚 proposals

Representations and objections about the report can now be made and must be received by Natural England by 5pm on Thursday 19 November 2015.

View Defra鈥檚 guidance on representations and objections.

Make a representation

Anyone can make representations to us about the variation report. Read the representation guidance notes before completing the representations form (both are attached above).

Make an objection

Owners and occupiers of affected land may make objections about the variation report. Read the objection guidance notes before completing the objection form (both are attached above).

Documents

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Updates to this page

Published 24 September 2015
Last updated 15 January 2016 show all updates
  1. Added details of consultation outcome.

  2. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page