Closed consultation

A63 Castle Street: Bridge Design Options

From:
Highways Agency
Published
20 January 2014
Last updated
20 January 2014 鈥� See all updates

We are analysing your feedback

Visit this page again soon to download the outcome to this public feedback.

Summary

Seeking your views on design options for the proposed new footbridge over the A63 at Princes Quay.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

Bridge design options for the footbridge over the A63 at Princes Quay. These form part of proposals to relieve congestion and provide better access to the Port of Hull by improving the A63 between the St James Street and Porter Street junctions and the Market Place and Queen Street junctions.

This is a targeted consultation; please only respond to this consultation only if you have been contacted by the Highways Agency directly and asked to participate.

Documents

PDF, 37.5 KB, 1 page

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PDF, 374 KB, 1 page

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PDF, 380 KB, 1 page

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PDF, 378 KB, 1 page

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PDF, 389 KB, 1 page

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PDF, 375 KB, 1 page

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Updates to this page

Published 20 January 2014
Last updated 20 January 2014 show all updates

  1. Clarification added that this is a targeted consultation.

  2. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page