188体育

Documents

Summary

The report is aimed at asset managers in risk management authorities (RMAs) who have already decided to 鈥榙o something different鈥� with their FCERM assets. These could include a seawall, an embankment, or a water level control structure. The report does not cover how to decide to 鈥榙o something different鈥� with an FCERM asset, it starts from the point where this decision has already been made.

The findings will also be of interest to landowners and other stakeholders.

Method

The project was carried out in 3 phases.

Phase 1: information gathering

This involved:

• reviewing existing knowledge through an extensive literature search and discussions with practitioners at workshops and interviews
• identifying the practical issues in decommissioning or transferring assets
• developing a preliminary 3-stage framework for carrying out transfer and decommissioning

Phase 2: identifying and capturing good practice

This involved:

• developing the 3-stage framework for carrying out transfer and decommissioning
• retrospectively testing the framework on 3 sites where asset transfer or decommissioning had already occurred or was in progress
• developing 5 case study examples

Phase 3: report

The report sets out the overall process and the detail of the 3-stage framework of initial assessment, detailed assessment and implementation. Examples of asset transfer and decommissioning are given in 5 detailed case studies, including coastal defence structures, mill gates at water mills, a pumping station and a gauging station weir. The case studies highlight methods that worked well, the main challenges involved and the lessons that were learnt.

Findings

The project:

• emphasises the importance of well-planned engagement and how to do this
• clearly sets out the 3-stage framework which can be used for all projects
• discusses transfer and decommissioning under 5 headings:
  • legal and regulatory framework
  • asset information
  • environment and sustainability
  • finance and funding
  • stakeholder engagement
• demonstrates the importance of thorough planning
• highlights how the decision to transfer or decommission should be regularly reviewed using new information

Project Information

Project managers: Dr Juliet de Little, Dr Zora van Leeuwen, Dr Sarah Twohig

This project was commissioned by the Environment Agency鈥檚 FCERM Directorate, as part of the joint Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme.