Flat-roofing contracts in the West Midlands: collusive tendering
Office of Fair Trading (OFT) closed Competition Act 1998 case.
狈辞.听CA98/1/2004
Decision of the OFT:
This decision was appealed to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) on 14 May 2004 (by Apex Asphalt and Paving Co. Limited) and on 11 May 2004 (by Richard W. Price (Roofing Contractors) Ltd. On the 24 February 2005 the CAT upheld the OFT's decision on liability in its entirety. For further details, see the website.
The list below sets out the parties and the penalty for each party.聽聽
Apex - 拢35,922.80
Briggs - 拢0聽
Brindley - 拢55,540.80
General Asphalte - 拢63,192.86
Howard Evans - 拢35,510.25聽
Price - 拢18,000.00
Redbrook - 拢17,802.90
Rio - 拢45,049.68
Solihull - 拢26,606.25
Brigg's financial penalty was reduced to zero because it was granted total immunity.聽 Howard Evans' financial penalty was reduced to 拢35,510.25 because it was granted a 50 per cent reduction from financial penalties as part of the OFT's leniency scheme.