ZS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and SN (CSM): [2017] UKUT 402 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 9 October 2017.
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
Assets variation - whether the tribunal erred in excluding an asset on the ground that it was the non-resident parent鈥檚 home - whether tribunal failed to make a determination as to the 鈥減rincipal home鈥� where it found that the non-resident parent had two homes - whether the tribunal properly addressed the evidence, made adequate findings of fact and gave adequate reasons.
Application of section 20(7)(a) Child Support Act 1991 鈥� consideration of R (IS) 2/08
Updates to this page
Published 26 October 2017