KW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2017] UKUT 54 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poynter on 31 January 2017.
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
The Secretary of State accepts that a commode is an 鈥渁id鈥� to manage incontinence The Secretary of State accepts that PIP is to be assessed with reference to the individual circumstances of the claimant