AA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2018] UKUT 339 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Hemingway on 12 October 2018.
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
Does the 鈥減erson鈥� in mobility descriptor 1d and 1f have to be playing an active role in preventing overwhelming psychological distress from occurring when a claimant is attempting to follow the route of a journey or is mere passive presence sufficient?
Updates to this page
Published 9 November 2018